Group And Save Sampling In Emergency Appendicectomy: A Multi-Centre Audit
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background
Emergency appendicectomy is one of the most common emergency surgical procedures performed
in Scotland. Despite low reported perioperative transfusion rates, no national guidelines exist
for pre-operative group and save (G&S) sampling. This multi-centre audit examined current G&S
sampling practice, transfusion rates, and the associated financial and environmental impact across
Scotland.
Methods
Data were collected retrospectively from 16 hospitals across 8 Scottish health boards, serving
approximately 3.6 million people. Adult patients undergoing emergency appendicectomy during
a consecutive 12-month period were included.
Results
A total of 1546 patients underwent appendicectomy, of whom 91.2% had a laparoscopic proce-
dure. A total of 2029 G&S samples were taken. Six patients received a blood transfusion within
7 days of surgery, with a transfusion rate of 0.4%, while 12 out of 16 hospitals recorded no
transfusions. The estimated cost of G&S sampling was £28,000-£77,000 with carbon emissions
of 872kg CO2e.
Conclusion
Emergency appendicectomy in Scotland is associated with a very low perioperative transfusion
rate despite widespread use of G&S sampling. These findings support further evaluation of
risk-stratified approaches to pre-operative blood testing.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This is an open-access journal, which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is under the BOAI definition of open access.
The journal is adopting the Creative Commons International Attribution 4. CC Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0CC BY-NC 4.0].
All articles published in BJSS are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY -NC 4.0) license. This permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is accurately cited.
Authors retain full copyright of their work. By submitting to BJSS, and once published, any third party may use the article freely provided the original authors, citation details, and publisher are clearly identified.
You are free to:
- Share— copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt— remix, transform, and build upon the material
- for any purpose
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
-
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes .
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
References
Moris D, Paulson EK, Pappas TN. Diagnosis and Management of Acute Appendicitis in
Adults: A Review. JAMA. 2021;326:2299-311.
Ramsay G, Wohlgemut JM, Jansen JO. Emergency general surgery in the United Kingdom:
A lot of general, not many emergencies, and not much surgery. J Trauma Acute Care Surg.
;85:500-6.
Baird DLH, Simillis C, Kontovounisios C, Rasheed S, Tekkis PP. Acute appendicitis. BMJ.
;357:j1703.
NHS England. Hospital Admitted Patient Care Activity, 2023-24; 2024. Avail-
able from: https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/
hospital-admitted-patient-care-activity/2023-24.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Routine preoperative tests for elective
surgery; 2016. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng45.
Fabiano G, Pinedo-Villanueva R, Kirtley S, et al. Substantial international variation in
the cost of blood group and save and crossmatch: A systematic review. Br J Haematol.
;208:1196-206.
Robinson A, Moses O, Bass J, Pegna V. The carbon footprint of group and save in elective
and emergency surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2026;108:137-43.
Chaudhari V, Mohammad H, Khan U. The Role of Group and Save Testing Prior to Emergency
Laparoscopic Appendicectomy. Cureus. 2024;16:e74898.
Harrow S, Nadarajasundaram A. Is Routine Group and Save Sampling Necessary for Emer-
gency Laparoscopic Appendicectomy? Cureus. 2025;17:e78086.
Al-Musawi J, Reece I, Chen JY, et al. Perioperative group and save testing are not routinely
indicated for emergency laparoscopic appendicectomy and laparoscopic hernia repairs: A
North West London retrospective study. J Perioper Pract. 2023;33:153-7.
Robertson I, Sundarraj JK, Khan KS. Routine preoperative blood group and save is unneces-
sary for adult emergency appendicectomies: A retrospective multicentre study. Scott Med J.
;70:10-4.
Fadel MG, Patel I, O’Leary L, Behar N, Brewer J. Requirement of preoperative blood typing
for cholecystectomy and appendectomy: a systematic review. Langenbecks Arch Surg.
;407:2205-16.
Pushpanathan NR, Hashim MNM, Zahari Z, et al. Conversion rate and risk factors of
conversion to open in laparoscopic appendicectomy. Ann Coloproctology. 2022;38:409-14.