Group And Save Sampling In Emergency Appendicectomy: A Multi-Centre Audit

Main Article Content

A Lumsden
M Stephens

Abstract

Background
Emergency appendicectomy is one of the most common emergency surgical procedures performed
in Scotland. Despite low reported perioperative transfusion rates, no national guidelines exist
for pre-operative group and save (G&S) sampling. This multi-centre audit examined current G&S
sampling practice, transfusion rates, and the associated financial and environmental impact across
Scotland.
Methods
Data were collected retrospectively from 16 hospitals across 8 Scottish health boards, serving
approximately 3.6 million people. Adult patients undergoing emergency appendicectomy during
a consecutive 12-month period were included.
Results
A total of 1546 patients underwent appendicectomy, of whom 91.2% had a laparoscopic proce-
dure. A total of 2029 G&S samples were taken. Six patients received a blood transfusion within
7 days of surgery, with a transfusion rate of 0.4%, while 12 out of 16 hospitals recorded no
transfusions. The estimated cost of G&S sampling was £28,000-£77,000 with carbon emissions
of 872kg CO2e.
Conclusion
Emergency appendicectomy in Scotland is associated with a very low perioperative transfusion
rate despite widespread use of G&S sampling. These findings support further evaluation of
risk-stratified approaches to pre-operative blood testing.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Lumsden, A., & Stephens, M. (2026). Group And Save Sampling In Emergency Appendicectomy: A Multi-Centre Audit. British Journal Of Surgical Science, 6(2). Retrieved from https://britishjournalofsurgicalscience.uk/index.php/bjoss/article/view/66
Section
GENERAL SURGERY

References

Moris D, Paulson EK, Pappas TN. Diagnosis and Management of Acute Appendicitis in

Adults: A Review. JAMA. 2021;326:2299-311.

Ramsay G, Wohlgemut JM, Jansen JO. Emergency general surgery in the United Kingdom:

A lot of general, not many emergencies, and not much surgery. J Trauma Acute Care Surg.

;85:500-6.

Baird DLH, Simillis C, Kontovounisios C, Rasheed S, Tekkis PP. Acute appendicitis. BMJ.

;357:j1703.

NHS England. Hospital Admitted Patient Care Activity, 2023-24; 2024. Avail-

able from: https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/

hospital-admitted-patient-care-activity/2023-24.

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Routine preoperative tests for elective

surgery; 2016. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng45.

Fabiano G, Pinedo-Villanueva R, Kirtley S, et al. Substantial international variation in

the cost of blood group and save and crossmatch: A systematic review. Br J Haematol.

;208:1196-206.

Robinson A, Moses O, Bass J, Pegna V. The carbon footprint of group and save in elective

and emergency surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2026;108:137-43.

Chaudhari V, Mohammad H, Khan U. The Role of Group and Save Testing Prior to Emergency

Laparoscopic Appendicectomy. Cureus. 2024;16:e74898.

Harrow S, Nadarajasundaram A. Is Routine Group and Save Sampling Necessary for Emer-

gency Laparoscopic Appendicectomy? Cureus. 2025;17:e78086.

Al-Musawi J, Reece I, Chen JY, et al. Perioperative group and save testing are not routinely

indicated for emergency laparoscopic appendicectomy and laparoscopic hernia repairs: A

North West London retrospective study. J Perioper Pract. 2023;33:153-7.

Robertson I, Sundarraj JK, Khan KS. Routine preoperative blood group and save is unneces-

sary for adult emergency appendicectomies: A retrospective multicentre study. Scott Med J.

;70:10-4.

Fadel MG, Patel I, O’Leary L, Behar N, Brewer J. Requirement of preoperative blood typing

for cholecystectomy and appendectomy: a systematic review. Langenbecks Arch Surg.

;407:2205-16.

Pushpanathan NR, Hashim MNM, Zahari Z, et al. Conversion rate and risk factors of

conversion to open in laparoscopic appendicectomy. Ann Coloproctology. 2022;38:409-14.