Prognostic factors influencing the outcome of empyema surgical management: prospective study in a Moroccan university center.

Main Article Content

Sara hafidi
Souheil Boubia
Abdellah Fatene
najat Id El Haj
Mohammed Ridai

Abstract

Background: Pleural empyema is a public health problem, and is the most frequent complication of pleural infection with significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. Our study aims to highlight the management of pleural empyema and evaluate its prognosis factors involved especially in surgical treatment.


Patients and Methods: A prospective analysis of 53 patients who underwent surgical treatment of pleural empyema, from January 2015 to December 2019 at the thoracic surgery department in a tertiary referral university teaching hospital. Our study included patients who required surgical treatment for pleural empyema and were excluded patients with destroyed lungs associated with pyothorax.


Results: The mean age of patients was 39.24±15.89 years and 79,24% of them were males. In 85.7% of the cases, the etiology was undetermined in 34%, parapneumonic in 1.9%, of tuberculosis in 54.71%, post-traumatic in 11, 3%, postoperative in 7.5% and iatrogenic in 1.9%. 45 patients were treated with broad-spectrum antibiotics therapy adapted after antibiogram 14.38±21.76 days before the operation. A complete debridement and decortications were performed by VATS in 28 and by PLT in 22 patients. No major complications occurred. At a mean term follow-up of 20 months (3months—3 years); all patients were alive with no recurrence. The analysis of the results showed 4 factors of poor prognosis: delay of diagnosis and surgery (P = 0.02), chronic alcoholism (P = 0.034), preoperative ventilation disorder/COPD (P = 0.04) and active tuberculosis (P= 0, 05).


Conclusion: The success of surgical management of pleural empyema depends on several factors, which predict the prognosis, but can be prevented.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
hafidi, S., Boubia, S., Fatene, A., Id El Haj, najat, & Ridai, M. (2021). Prognostic factors influencing the outcome of empyema surgical management: prospective study in a Moroccan university center. British Journal Of Surgical Science, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.54323/bjoss.2021.10
Section
GENERAL SURGERY
Author Biographies

Souheil Boubia, university hospital IBN ROCHD OF CASABLANCA

Associate Professor of thoracic surgery

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Ibn Rochd-Casablanca University Hospital center, Morocco

 Hassan 2 University of Casablanca, Morocco

Abdellah Fatene, university hospital IBN ROCHD OF CASABLANCA

  M.D,Thoracic surgeon

 Department of Thoracic Surgery, Ibn Rochd-Casablanca University Hospital center, Morocco

 Hassan 2 University of Casablanca, Morocco

najat Id El Haj

Assistant Professor of thoracic surgery

 Department of Thoracic Surgery, Ibn Rochd-Casablanca University Hospital center, Morocco

  Hassan 2 University of Casablanca, Morocco

Mohammed Ridai

Professor and head of departement  of thoracic surgery

 Department of Thoracic Surgery, Ibn Rochd-Casablanca University Hospital center,Morocco

 Hassan 2 University of Casablanca, Morocco

References

Ahmed AEH, Yacoub TE. Empyema thoracis. Clin Med Insights Circ Respir Pulm Med 2010; 4: 1–8.

Modi P, Ionescu MI, Society for Cardiothoracic Surgery in Great Britain & Ireland, et al. Perspectives in cardiothoracic surgery. 2016.

Surgery for Pleural Sepsis | CTSNet, https://www.ctsnet.org/article/surgery-pleural-sepsis (accessed 4 January 2021).

Cargill TN, Hassan M, Corcoran JP, et al. A systematic review of comorbidities and outcomes of adult patients with pleural infection. Eur Respir J; 54. Epub ahead of print 1 October 2019. DOI: 10.1183/13993003.00541-2019.

Cameron RJ, Davies HRHR. Intra‐pleural fibrinolytic therapy versus conservative management in the treatment of adult parapneumonic effusions and empyema. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Epub ahead of print 2008. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002312.pub3.

Migliore M. Nonintubated Uniportal Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery for Chest Infections. Thoracic Surgery Clinics 2020; 30: 33–39.

Subotic D, Lardinois D, Hojski A. Minimally invasive thoracic surgery for empyema. Breathe (Sheff) 2018; 14: 302–310.

Rzyman W, Skokowski J, Romanowicz G, et al. Decortication in chronic pleural empyema — effect on lung function. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery 2002; 21: 502–507.

Chambers A, Routledge T, Dunning J, et al. Is video-assisted thoracoscopic surgical decortication superior to open surgery in the management of adults with primary empyema? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2010; 11: 171–177.

Chung JH, Lee SH, Kim KT, et al. Optimal timing of thoracoscopic drainage and decortication for empyema. Ann Thorac Surg 2014; 97: 224–229.

Lardinois D, Gock M, Pezzetta E, et al. Delayed Referral and Gram-Negative Organisms Increase the Conversion Thoracotomy Rate in Patients Undergoing Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery for Empyema. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery 2005; 79: 1851–1856.

Preoperative Predictors of Successful Surgical Treatment in the Management of Parapneumonic Empyema - ScienceDirect, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0003497513012794 (accessed 23 January 2021).

Migliore M. Nonintubated Uniportal Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery for Chest Infections. Thoracic Surgery Clinics 2020; 30: 33–39.

Shen KR, Bribriesco A, Crabtree T, et al. The American Association for Thoracic Surgery consensus guidelines for the management of empyema. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2017; 153: e129–e146.

Farjah F, Symons RG, Krishnadasan B, et al. Management of pleural space infections: A population-based analysis. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2007; 133: 346-351.e1.

Outcome and clinical characteristics in pleural empyema: a retrospective study - PubMed, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21366407/ (accessed 9 January 2021).