
Discussion
OAGB is a relatively new operation to treat obesity and its metabolic consequences, a less
challenging technique if compared to the classical RYGB. Single anastomosis bypass afforded
shorter operative times, less postoperative analgesia use, shorter length of stay, and fewer
postoperative complications and has achieved the weight loss goals equalling or outperforming
adjustable bands and RYGB (
3
;
4
;
5
). The known drawbacks of this procedure include a risk of
biliary reflux and anastomotic ulcers or stenosis, and a risk of malnutrition if the common limb is
shorter than 2m (
6
). We present rare complications following OAGB and it should be considered
in the differential diagnosis of abdominal pain post OAGB.
Afferent loop syndrome or obstruction was first described in 1950 by Roux, Pedoussaut, and
Marchal in post-gastrectomy patients with bilious vomiting (
7
). ALO can be either acute or chronic,
early or late post operatively, and result in complete or partial obstruction.
Chronic ALO following OAGB has been described in the literature (
1
;
6
) however, this is the first
reported case of acute ALO post OAGB, to the authors’ knowledge. The reason for the obstruction
of the afferent limb in OAGB could be due to a stricture, fibrosis secondary to anastomotic ulcer,
adhesions, or an internal hernia. Classically the redundancy of an ante-colic afferent loop, with
the bowel length longer than 30–40 cm, increases the risk of kinking, volvulus, and entrapment
of the limb by adhesions (
1
). Having a 1.5-2 meter afferent limb, which is often the case in OAGB,
is in itself a risk for ALO.
The diagnosis of chronic ALO can be confirmed by measuring bacterial overgrowth, although this
requires a jejunal aspirate performed during endoscopy with jejunal intubation. If the microbial
load is more than 106 organisms per millilitre of aspirate it will be considered pathological (
6
).
Imaging is the cornerstone of diagnosis in ALO with contrast-enhanced CT being the gold standard,
especially in the acute setting (8).
A few studies are looking at the aetiology for conversion of OAGB to RYGB, none reported acute
ALO as a reason for conversion. Jedamzik et al who looked at 1025 patients with OAGB over an
8year period, found that 8% of the cases were converted to RYGB, they reported the indication
for conversion as biliary reflux, a marginal ulcer, malnutrition, weight regain, or anastomotic
stenosis (2). This series showed that ALO is not of concern in this operation.
In their series of 16 patients converted from OAGB to RYGB, Landreneau JP reported the primary
indications for conversion as intractable nausea and vomiting (n = 8, 50.0%), biliary reflux (n =
3, 18.7%), protein-calorie malnutrition (n = 2, 12.5%), or chronic abdominal pain secondary to
marginal ulceration (n = 1, 6.3%) (9).
Blockman and his colleagues however reported chronic ALO in 6/28 of converted cases from
OAGB to RYGB which is around 21% of the converted cases. [2] Overall morbidity has been
reported at 5.5% (n=55); 35 patients (3.5%) presented with an early complication and 20 patients
(2%) presented with a late complication. There were two deaths due to major cardiovascular
complications (10).
Different techniques have been described in the literature to convert OAGB to RYGBP, the
technique is adjusted according to the indication for conversion and the urgency of the operation.
The conversion rate from laparoscopic to open is reported to be up to 25% with this type of
operation (
9
) and this is mainly when this operation is performed in an emergency setting. In our
case, it was deemed unsafe to proceed laparoscopically, and early conversion was the best option
given the severity of dilatation of the afferent limb and gastric remnant which made the anatomy
unclear.
Treatment of acute ALO post-OAGB is surgical and best performed by a bariatric surgeon in
bariatric units, the best surgical strategy is to convert to RYGB, and in acute ALO this should
be done urgently to prevent catastrophic complications. However, morbidity related to the
conversion of OAGB to RYGBP should not be ignored, in 2017 a series published the morbidities
post-conversion as high as 41%, 7/17 of the patients developed major post-operative events.
134/135