
detrusor muscle. Stoma stenosis or stricture can also result in back pressure which may force
urine through a weakened conduit wall (2;5).
When the clinical suspicious arises of fistulous formation, several investigations and imaging
can be performed to confirm the diagnosis as well as to delineate the anatomical configuration
of the fistula. A simple methylene blue injection through the fistula opening or via installation
through the ileal conduit may help to identify the fistula (
2
). As in our case, methylene blue was
instilled into the ileal conduit using the Foley catheter and by using flexible sigmoidoscopy the
extravasation of the methylene blue was identified in the rectum. Other imaging modalities such
as CT scan, loopography, or MR urography may further identify anatomical anomalies of the
patient.
Management of the ileal conduit fistula must be individualized by taking into consideration of
underlying comorbidities, history of previous abdominal surgery, and previous chemotherapy or
radiotherapy. Inpatient with concurrent comorbid with a history of multiple abdominal surgeries,
conservative management, or minimally invasive often become the best choice of treatment (
6
;
7
;
8
). With the evidence of urinary tract obstruction or hydronephrosis, retrograde stenting or
percutaneous nephrostomy is a good option for urinary diversion. Intra-conduit negative pressure
system has recently been introduced for the treatment of ileal conduit fistula (Figure 3). Although
it is time-consuming (7–11 days) but it is an extremely simple, safe, and mini-invasive method (
4
).
Figure 3
Other minimally invasive techniques such as fulguration with or without sclerosis of the tract
may be used for this condition to disrupt the cellular membrane and promote tract scarring (9).
With the advancement of the endoscopic technique, over-the-scope-clip (OTSC) has been in-
troduced as a treatment option the fistula, gastrointestinal bleeding, and anastomosis leakage.
It provides significantly more strength and larger tissue capture as compared to conventional
through-the-scope clips (TTS) (
10
). The success rate of the procedure ranges from 70-99% de-
pending on the underlying etiology, duration of fistula, and presence of concurrent infection or
ischemia (
11
). The OTSC consists of a shape-memory nitinol alloy, which returns to its initial
shape when it is released from the applicator, allowing for closure of the clip (
12
). There are three
different varieties of the clip namely traumatic, atraumatic, and gastric closure clip suitable for
different indications and tissue (Figure 4). After attaching the clip to the tip of the endoscope, the
clip was then directed to come into close contact with the target lesion or fistula. Endoscopic
suction, a twin grasper, or an alligator can be used to facilitate targeting of the lesion. Once the
target has been confirmed, the clip is deployed by stretching a wire with a handwheel fixed on
the working channel (Figure 5) (
11
). Immediate closure of fistula then confirmed by injecting
methylene blue or contrast agent through the ileal conduit under fluoroscopic guidance. There is
no published paper comparing the effectiveness of OTSC as compared to TTS as regards the man-
agement of fistula. However, it is proven that OTSC is more effective than standard endoscopic
therapy for a patient with recurrent bleeding of peptic ulcer (13).
Even though OTCS is considered a relatively safe device, there are few reported complications
including jejunal stenosis, positional deviation due to tissue fibrosis, obstruction of the esophago-
gastric junction, fistula injury due to the forceps, micro-perforation of a hemorrhagic duodenal
ulcer due to the OTSC claws and further maceration of the perforated site (
14
;
15
;
16
). However,
56/58